Maximal Quotient Rings1
نویسنده
چکیده
Let R be an associative ring in which an identity element is not assumed. A right quotient ring of P is an overring 5 such that for each aQS there corresponds rQR such that arQR and ar 9*0. A theorem of R. E. Johnson [l ] states that R possesses a right quotient ring S which is a (von Neumann) regular ring if and only if P has vanishing right singular ideal. In this case P possesses a unique (up to isomorphism over P) maximal right quotient ring S, and 5 is regular and right self-injective (Johnson-Wong [l]). It is easy to see that 5 is the injective hull of P, considering both rings as right P-modules in the natural way. Thus, each right ideal I oí R has an injective hull Îr contained in 5. In this notation, S=R¡¡, and we use R to denote the maximal right quotient ring of P hereafter. By the results of Johnson [2], Îr can be characterized in two ways: (a) Ir is the unique maximal essential extension of I contained in the right P-module P. (b) Îr is the principal right ideal of R generated by I. Since Îr is therefore a right ideal of R, A = Homg (ÎR, ÎR) is defined. Setting r = HomÄ (7, I), one of our main results (Theorem 2) states that f = Homg (Îr, Îr) =A. This means that T has vanishing right singular ideal, and that A is the maximal right quotient ring of r. Since Îr is a principal right ideal in the regular ring R, there exists an idempotent eQR such that îR — eÈ.. Then, of course, AÇ^eRe, and it is natural to investigate the relationship between eRe and K = eRei\R. In general, it is too much to hope that eRe = K, since it is possible that K = Of or some nonzero eQR. Nevertheless, under the assumption that R is also a left quotient ring of P, or in case e is a primitive idempotent satisfying eReC\R9*0, we establish (Theorem 3) that K has vanishing right singular ideal, and that eRe = K ( = the maximal right quotient ring of A.) In any case, for any nonzero idempotent eGPi eRe is the maximal right quotient ring of eRe. Since we are not restricting ourselves to rings with identity, we say
منابع مشابه
A Hilbert-Mumford-Criterion for SL2-Actions
Let the special linear group G := SL 2 act regularly on a Q-factorial variety X. Consider a maximal torus T ⊂ G and its normalizer N ⊂ G. We prove: If U ⊂ X is a maximal open N-invariant subset admitting a good quotient U → U/ /N with a divisorial quotient space, then the intersection W (U) of all translates g·U is open in X and admits a good quotient W (U) → W (U)/ /G with a divisorial quotien...
متن کاملThe Maximal Free Rational Quotient
This short, expository note proves existence of the maximal quotient of a variety by free rational curves. 1. Definition of a maximal free rational quotient Definition 1.1. Let V be a Deligne-Mumford stack over a field k, and denote the smooth locus by V sm ⊂ V . A 1-morphism f : Pk → V sm is a free rational curve to V if fTV is generated by global sections and has positive degree. Let S be an ...
متن کاملTransformation of BL-general Fuzzy Automata
In this paper, we prove that any BL-general fuzzy automaton (BL-GFA) and its quotient have the same behavior. In addition, we obtain the minimal quotient BL-GFA and minimal quotient transformation of the BL-GFA, considering the notion of maximal admissible partition. Furthermore, we show that the number of input symbols and time complexity of the minimal quotient transformation of a BL-GFA are ...
متن کاملDistributions of Maximal Invariants Using Quotient Measures
This paper demonstrates the use of proper actions and quotient measures in representations of non~central distributions of maximal invariants.
متن کامل